Disgusting People

Solicitor Joseph Tang Convicted of Misconduct for Delay in Paying Counsel! 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月!  https://misconductconviction.blogspot.com/2020/03/hong-kong-solicitor-tang-ming-fai-joseph-convicted-of-misconduct-for-delay-in-paying-barrister-lawrence-lok-sc.html 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月! 點解會有事務律師唔找或者遲找大律師嘅費用咁低能？會俾香港律師會釘牌嗰喎！Not paying Counsel's Fees or being late in paying Barristers is a serious act of misconduct punishable by suspension from practice! http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/tang-ming-fai-joseph-respondent December 2012 - Disciplinary Decisions - Tang Ming Fai, Joseph (the Respondent) • Principles 6.04, 12.04 and 12.05 of the Hong Kong Solicitors’ Guide to Professional Conduct Volume 1 (“the Guide”) Hearing dates: 19 April 2012 and 20 August 2012 Order: 20 August 2012 Reasons for Decision: 11 October 2012 On 20 August 2012, the Tribunal found the following ten charges as in the Amended Complaint Sheet dated 23 December 2011 proven against the Responde...

This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung  (張曉惠大律師)  of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong, for she had dishonestly or otherwise knowingly given false evidence under oath before Barnes J in HCCC 312/2017 [2018] HKCFI 2711, resulting in her being disbelieved by Barnes J.   Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung had thereby acted in breach of  paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code . This public judgment says it all: - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=119316&currpage=T 1.  The applicant Ma Ka Kin was originally jointly charged with one Hung Chi Him (“Ah Him”) with one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug (1,185 grammes of cocaine).  The charge was amended, leaving the applicant facing the charge alone.  The applicant pleaded guilty on 28 August 2017 to the amended charge before a Magistrate and was committed to the CFI of the High Court for sentence. 2.  ...

This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister Sio Chan In Devin (蕭震然大律師) of DES Chambers, Unit B, 5/F, Eton Bldg, No.288 Des Voeux Rd Central, H.K., for he has been charged with conspiracy to defraud and has thereby acted in breach of paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code. https://disgustingbarristers.blogspot.com/2021/09/barrister-devin-sio-of-des-chambers-arrested-for-conspiracy-to-defraud.html These new reports are self-explanatory: - https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news-print/179777/Police-arrest-12-for-embezzling-over-HK$60m-in-property-fraud-scheme Fake property owners cheat victims of HK$60m Thursday, September 02, 2021 Police have busted a crime syndicate whose members impersonated as owners of idle properties and sell them using fraudulent documents, cheating victims of over HK$60 million. Twelve people were arrested for conspiracy to defraud, including a barrister. They were busted after they attempted to cheat the Urban Renewal Authority into buying a To Kwa Wan ...

Barrister Kerby Lau of Des Voeux Chambers (DVC) “unhelpful”, says [2018] HKCA 403 (Cheung, Yuen and Kwan JJA) 8.   The defendant’s counsel cited a total of 38 cases in this application .  As stated in Practice Direction 2.1 §3(e), the skeleton submissions “should direct at helping the Court to determine whether grounds have been made out for the appeal to be heard by the Court of Final Appeal”.   It is unhelpful to load the submissions with copious authorities making more or less the same point in a number of instances . Written submissions by Barristers Mr Chua Guan Hock SC and Mr Kerby Lau, instructed by K B Chau & Co Solicitors, for the Defendant (Applicant) https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=116701&currpage=T http://gettingjusticeinhongkong.blogspot.com/2019/05/barrister-chua-guan-hock-sc-and-barrister-kerby-lau-unhelpful-says-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html

Haldanes Solicitors Used Wrong Procedure To Add a Defamation Counterclaim to a Defence, And Should Pay Indemnity Costs to Its Opponent, Says Judge Queeny Au-Yeung in HCA 492/2020 [2021] HKCFI 1040 - DEEPAK PAGARANI AND HIRO BHARWANI v. HALDANES SOLICITORS & NOTARIES (A FIRM)  Ms Jezamine Fewins, of Stephenson Harwood, for the plaintiffs Mr Barry Barlow, SC, instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, for the defendant  https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=135819&currpage=T https://unreasonablelitigants.blogspot.com/2021/05/haldanes-solicitors-used-wrong-procedure-to-add-a-counterclaim-to-a-defence-says-judge-queeny-au-yeung.html

Solicitor Au Wing Lun William - N onsensical, Defies Common Sense, The Most Absurd Submission Ever Heard, Appalling, Abuse of Process - 區穎麟律師知唔知醜㗎！ http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2007/719.html AU WING LUN v. TAM MEI KAM AND OTHERS [2007] HKCFI 719; HCA 811/2007 (13 July 2007) Before : Hon Poon J in Chambers Plainly, the relationship between Mr Au and the Mother, together with the requisite trust and confidence which is essential to the relationship, has completely collapsed. In my view, the rent in the parties’ relationship is so deep that it is simply impossible for the Mother to continue to place any trust or confidence in Mr Au. When that very basis is gone, how can Mr Au continue to act for the Mother in the Probate Action? Mr Au suggested that he can do so and protect her interests without taking instructions from her and despite her objection. This is simply nonsensical. It defies common sense, rocks the very foundation of a solicitor-client relationship and destroys ...

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam  DCCJ 1917/2018 [2021] HKDC 378 LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋) 90. I find that Milton Lai was fabricating his evidence in court. It seems to me that Milton Lai was trying to salvage the weakness in the plaintiff’s case where the plaintiff cared nothing about the mortgage. I reject Milton Lai’s evidence entirely in relation to the purchase of the Property or any discussion about the mortgage. I did not believe a financial consultant could have advised his father when acquiring a property without any of the above-mentioned essential information. https://unreasonablelitigants.blogspot.com/2021/04/milton-lai-fabricated-evidence-in-court-said-ddj-george-lam.html

Barrister James McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Admitted Misconduct in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189 https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125051&currpage=T 36. Before us, Mr McGowan candidly admitted that his actions (or lack thereof) were such as to bring him within the meaning of s.18 of the CCCO. In particular, he accepted that on his part there had been undue delay as well as a repeated failure to comply with the Court's directions, which amounted to serious professional misconduct.