Haldanes Solicitors Used Wrong Procedure To Add a Defamation Counterclaim to a Defence

Haldanes Solicitors Used Wrong Procedure To Add a Defamation Counterclaim to a Defence, And Should Pay Indemnity Costs to Its Opponent, Says Judge Queeny Au-Yeung in HCA 492/2020 [2021] HKCFI 1040 - DEEPAK PAGARANI AND HIRO BHARWANI v. HALDANES SOLICITORS & NOTARIES (A FIRM) 

Ms Jezamine Fewins, of Stephenson Harwood, for the plaintiffs

Mr Barry Barlow, SC, instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, for the defendant 

https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=135819&currpage=T

https://unreasonablelitigants.blogspot.com/2021/05/haldanes-solicitors-used-wrong-procedure-to-add-a-counterclaim-to-a-defence-says-judge-queeny-au-yeung.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 被法官狠批「做法不專業，損人不利己」(Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)

鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 被法官狠批「做法不專業，損人不利己」(Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self) https://joycekwan20130602.blogspot.com/2014/01/lawyer-hylas-chung-counsel-barrister-unprofessional.html 香港特別行政區 訴 袁郁鈞 (Reported in: [2007] 1 HKLRD 819) HCMA730/2006 (裁判日期：2007年1月23日) https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=55815&QS=%2B&TP=JU 「上訴人的大律師鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 本身對刑事審訊接納證據的基本法則一知半解，胡亂指控聆訊時代表上訴人的大律師不稱職，不切實際地提昇上訴人對成功上訴的期望、做法不專業，損人不利己 (Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)，絕對不值得鼓勵或仿效 (Utterly Should Never Be Encouraged Or Imitated。」 - 高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官潘敏琦 (Deputy High Court Judge Maggie Poon)
Read more

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam - LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋)

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam  DCCJ 1917/2018 [2021] HKDC 378 LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋) 90. I find that Milton Lai was fabricating his evidence in court. It seems to me that Milton Lai was trying to salvage the weakness in the plaintiff’s case where the plaintiff cared nothing about the mortgage. I reject Milton Lai’s evidence entirely in relation to the purchase of the Property or any discussion about the mortgage. I did not believe a financial consultant could have advised his father when acquiring a property without any of the above-mentioned essential information. https://unreasonablelitigants.blogspot.com/2021/04/milton-lai-fabricated-evidence-in-court-said-ddj-george-lam.html
Read more

Solicitor Joseph Tang Convicted of Misconduct for Delay in Paying Counsel - 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月!

Solicitor Joseph Tang Convicted of Misconduct for Delay in Paying Counsel! 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月!  https://misconductconviction.blogspot.com/2020/03/hong-kong-solicitor-tang-ming-fai-joseph-convicted-of-misconduct-for-delay-in-paying-barrister-lawrence-lok-sc.html 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月! 點解會有事務律師唔找或者遲找大律師嘅費用咁低能？會俾香港律師會釘牌嗰喎！Not paying Counsel's Fees or being late in paying Barristers is a serious act of misconduct punishable by suspension from practice! http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/tang-ming-fai-joseph-respondent December 2012 - Disciplinary Decisions - Tang Ming Fai, Joseph (the Respondent) • Principles 6.04, 12.04 and 12.05 of the Hong Kong Solicitors’ Guide to Professional Conduct Volume 1 (“the Guide”) Hearing dates: 19 April 2012 and 20 August 2012 Order: 20 August 2012 Reasons for Decision: 11 October 2012 On 20 August 2012, the Tribunal found the following ten charges as in the Amended Complaint Sheet dated 23 December 2011 proven against the Responde...
Read more