鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 被法官狠批「做法不專業，損人不利己」(Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)

鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 被法官狠批「做法不專業，損人不利己」(Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)

https://joycekwan20130602.blogspot.com/2014/01/lawyer-hylas-chung-counsel-barrister-unprofessional.html

香港特別行政區 訴 袁郁鈞 (Reported in: [2007] 1 HKLRD 819) HCMA730/2006 (裁判日期：2007年1月23日)

https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=55815&QS=%2B&TP=JU

「上訴人的大律師鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 本身對刑事審訊接納證據的基本法則一知半解，胡亂指控聆訊時代表上訴人的大律師不稱職，不切實際地提昇上訴人對成功上訴的期望、做法不專業，損人不利己 (Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)，絕對不值得鼓勵或仿效 (Utterly Should Never Be Encouraged Or Imitated。」 - 高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官潘敏琦 (Deputy High Court Judge Maggie Poon)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gilt Chambers Barrister Phillip Ross Unworthy - Said Court of Appeal​ in HKSAR v Apelete (No 2) [2019] 5 HKLRD 602 [2019] HKCA 1320 (per ​Macrae VP​ at para 58)​

Gilt Chambers Barrister Phillip Ross Unworthy - Said Court of Appeal ​ in  HKSAR v Apelete (No 2) [2019] 5 HKLRD 602 [2019] HKCA 1320  ( per ​Macrae VP​ at para 58)​  "S​ uch an answer, for which Mr Ross took no instructions before uttering it, was unworthy of any advocate appearing before the Court of Appeal and was as fanciful and devoid of common sense as the ground of appeal itself. ​" -  per  ​ Macrae VP ​ at para 58.​ Mr Phillip Ross, instructed by K B Chau & Co, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Applicant https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125647&currpage=T
Read more

Garden Chambers Barrister Dorothy Cheung Disgusting! 投訴香港大律師張曉惠!

This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung  (張曉惠大律師)  of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong, for she had dishonestly or otherwise knowingly given false evidence under oath before Barnes J in HCCC 312/2017 [2018] HKCFI 2711, resulting in her being disbelieved by Barnes J.   Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung had thereby acted in breach of  paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code . This public judgment says it all: - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=119316&currpage=T 1.  The applicant Ma Ka Kin was originally jointly charged with one Hung Chi Him (“Ah Him”) with one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug (1,185 grammes of cocaine).  The charge was amended, leaving the applicant facing the charge alone.  The applicant pleaded guilty on 28 August 2017 to the amended charge before a Magistrate and was committed to the CFI of the High Court for sentence. 2.  ...
Read more

Misconduct of Rocky Yung, Personal Injuries Solicitor of B Mak & Co., Reported to Law Society of Hong Kong for Investigation – Cheung Ka Man v Wong Yu Huen [2023] HKDC 370 – 17 March 2023

麥耀華律師行容本樂律師俾區域法院李樹旭法官猛烈批評並且被轉介香港律師會作違反操守行為調查! Misconduct of Rocky Yung, Personal Injuries Solicitor of B Mak & Co., Reported to Law Society of Hong Kong for Investigation – Cheung Ka Man v Wong Yu Huen [2023] HKDC 370 – 17 March 2023 https://indemnitycosts.wordpress.com/2023/04/17/misconduct-of-rocky-yung-solicitor-of-b-mak-co-reported-to-law-society-of-hong-kong-for-investigation-cheung-ka-man-v-wong-yu-huen-2023-hkdc-370-17-march-2023/
Read more