District Court Entered Judgment Against Disgusting Former Special Magistrate Ho Lai Ming Who Did Not Even File a Defence In Court
District Court Entered Judgment Against Disgusting Former Special Magistrate Ho Lai Ming Who Did Not Even File a Defence In Court 前暫委特委裁判官何麗明，早前處理一宗尼泊爾籍女保安涉不小心過馬路案審逾一年，該女保安稱審訊期間曾因如廁遲到1分鐘，之後被何官要求交出保釋金100元，女保安認為何官做法錯誤，令她情感受到傷害，入稟索償170萬元。區域法院法官就女保安的索償案下判辭，指代表何官的律政司未有依法庭規定在指定期限交答辯書，直接裁定女保安勝訴，賠償金額則有待評核。 法官強調，是否跟從法庭命令，非由律政司自行決定，本案中律政司違反法庭命令，是故意和傲慢。由於法官認為律政司要求剔除案件的理據並不成立，律政司在沒有依令呈交抗辯書的情況下， 法官最終直接判Thapa Kamala勝訟，但賠償額則有待評核。 案件編號：DCCJ1719/2019 https://bit.ly/3ECKJgs https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=139794&currpage=T ORDER 63. By reasons of the aforesaid, I order that... Interlocutory judgment be entered against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Mr Albert N B Wong, instructed by Department of Justice, for the defendant