District Court Entered Judgment Against Disgusting Former Special Magistrate Ho Lai Ming Who Did Not Even File a Defence In Court

District Court Entered Judgment Against Disgusting Former Special Magistrate Ho Lai Ming Who Did Not Even File a Defence In Court

前暫委特委裁判官何麗明，早前處理一宗尼泊爾籍女保安涉不小心過馬路案審逾一年，該女保安稱審訊期間曾因如廁遲到1分鐘，之後被何官要求交出保釋金100元，女保安認為何官做法錯誤，令她情感受到傷害，入稟索償170萬元。區域法院法官就女保安的索償案下判辭，指代表何官的律政司未有依法庭規定在指定期限交答辯書，直接裁定女保安勝訴，賠償金額則有待評核。

法官強調，是否跟從法庭命令，非由律政司自行決定，本案中律政司違反法庭命令，是故意和傲慢。由於法官認為律政司要求剔除案件的理據並不成立，律政司在沒有依令呈交抗辯書的情況下， 法官最終直接判Thapa Kamala勝訟，但賠償額則有待評核。
案件編號：DCCJ1719/2019


ORDER 63. By reasons of the aforesaid, I order that... Interlocutory judgment be entered against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Mr Albert N B Wong, instructed by Department of Justice, for the defendant

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gilt Chambers Barrister Phillip Ross Unworthy - Said Court of Appeal​ in HKSAR v Apelete (No 2) [2019] 5 HKLRD 602 [2019] HKCA 1320 (per ​Macrae VP​ at para 58)​

Gilt Chambers Barrister Phillip Ross Unworthy - Said Court of Appeal ​ in  HKSAR v Apelete (No 2) [2019] 5 HKLRD 602 [2019] HKCA 1320  ( per ​Macrae VP​ at para 58)​  "S​ uch an answer, for which Mr Ross took no instructions before uttering it, was unworthy of any advocate appearing before the Court of Appeal and was as fanciful and devoid of common sense as the ground of appeal itself. ​" -  per  ​ Macrae VP ​ at para 58.​ Mr Phillip Ross, instructed by K B Chau & Co, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Applicant https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125647&currpage=T
Read more

Garden Chambers Barrister Dorothy Cheung Disgusting! 投訴香港大律師張曉惠!

This is a formal complaint against Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung  (張曉惠大律師)  of Garden Chambers, 15/F, Printing House, Central, Hong Kong, for she had dishonestly or otherwise knowingly given false evidence under oath before Barnes J in HCCC 312/2017 [2018] HKCFI 2711, resulting in her being disbelieved by Barnes J.   Hong Kong Barrister  Dorothy Cheung had thereby acted in breach of  paragraph 4.1(b) of the Bar Code . This public judgment says it all: - https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=119316&currpage=T 1.  The applicant Ma Ka Kin was originally jointly charged with one Hung Chi Him (“Ah Him”) with one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug (1,185 grammes of cocaine).  The charge was amended, leaving the applicant facing the charge alone.  The applicant pleaded guilty on 28 August 2017 to the amended charge before a Magistrate and was committed to the CFI of the High Court for sentence. 2.  ...
Read more

Misconduct of Rocky Yung, Personal Injuries Solicitor of B Mak & Co., Reported to Law Society of Hong Kong for Investigation – Cheung Ka Man v Wong Yu Huen [2023] HKDC 370 – 17 March 2023

麥耀華律師行容本樂律師俾區域法院李樹旭法官猛烈批評並且被轉介香港律師會作違反操守行為調查! Misconduct of Rocky Yung, Personal Injuries Solicitor of B Mak & Co., Reported to Law Society of Hong Kong for Investigation – Cheung Ka Man v Wong Yu Huen [2023] HKDC 370 – 17 March 2023 https://indemnitycosts.wordpress.com/2023/04/17/misconduct-of-rocky-yung-solicitor-of-b-mak-co-reported-to-law-society-of-hong-kong-for-investigation-cheung-ka-man-v-wong-yu-huen-2023-hkdc-370-17-march-2023/
Read more