District Court Entered Judgment Against Disgusting Former Special Magistrate Ho Lai Ming Who Did Not Even File a Defence In Court

District Court Entered Judgment Against Disgusting Former Special Magistrate Ho Lai Ming Who Did Not Even File a Defence In Court

前暫委特委裁判官何麗明，早前處理一宗尼泊爾籍女保安涉不小心過馬路案審逾一年，該女保安稱審訊期間曾因如廁遲到1分鐘，之後被何官要求交出保釋金100元，女保安認為何官做法錯誤，令她情感受到傷害，入稟索償170萬元。區域法院法官就女保安的索償案下判辭，指代表何官的律政司未有依法庭規定在指定期限交答辯書，直接裁定女保安勝訴，賠償金額則有待評核。

法官強調，是否跟從法庭命令，非由律政司自行決定，本案中律政司違反法庭命令，是故意和傲慢。由於法官認為律政司要求剔除案件的理據並不成立，律政司在沒有依令呈交抗辯書的情況下， 法官最終直接判Thapa Kamala勝訟，但賠償額則有待評核。
案件編號：DCCJ1719/2019


ORDER 63. By reasons of the aforesaid, I order that... Interlocutory judgment be entered against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Mr Albert N B Wong, instructed by Department of Justice, for the defendant

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 被法官狠批「做法不專業，損人不利己」(Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)

鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 被法官狠批「做法不專業，損人不利己」(Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self) https://joycekwan20130602.blogspot.com/2014/01/lawyer-hylas-chung-counsel-barrister-unprofessional.html 香港特別行政區 訴 袁郁鈞 (Reported in: [2007] 1 HKLRD 819) HCMA730/2006 (裁判日期：2007年1月23日) https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=55815&QS=%2B&TP=JU 「上訴人的大律師鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 本身對刑事審訊接納證據的基本法則一知半解，胡亂指控聆訊時代表上訴人的大律師不稱職，不切實際地提昇上訴人對成功上訴的期望、做法不專業，損人不利己 (Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)，絕對不值得鼓勵或仿效 (Utterly Should Never Be Encouraged Or Imitated。」 - 高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官潘敏琦 (Deputy High Court Judge Maggie Poon)
Read more

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam - LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋)

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam  DCCJ 1917/2018 [2021] HKDC 378 LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋) 90. I find that Milton Lai was fabricating his evidence in court. It seems to me that Milton Lai was trying to salvage the weakness in the plaintiff’s case where the plaintiff cared nothing about the mortgage. I reject Milton Lai’s evidence entirely in relation to the purchase of the Property or any discussion about the mortgage. I did not believe a financial consultant could have advised his father when acquiring a property without any of the above-mentioned essential information. https://unreasonablelitigants.blogspot.com/2021/04/milton-lai-fabricated-evidence-in-court-said-ddj-george-lam.html
Read more

Barrister Kerby Lau of Des Voeux Chambers (DVC) “unhelpful”, says [2018] HKCA 403 (Cheung, Yuen and Kwan JJA)

Barrister Kerby Lau of Des Voeux Chambers (DVC) “unhelpful”, says [2018] HKCA 403 (Cheung, Yuen and Kwan JJA) 8.   The defendant’s counsel cited a total of 38 cases in this application .  As stated in Practice Direction 2.1 §3(e), the skeleton submissions “should direct at helping the Court to determine whether grounds have been made out for the appeal to be heard by the Court of Final Appeal”.   It is unhelpful to load the submissions with copious authorities making more or less the same point in a number of instances . Written submissions by Barristers Mr Chua Guan Hock SC and Mr Kerby Lau, instructed by K B Chau & Co Solicitors, for the Defendant (Applicant) https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=116701&currpage=T http://gettingjusticeinhongkong.blogspot.com/2019/05/barrister-chua-guan-hock-sc-and-barrister-kerby-lau-unhelpful-says-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html
Read more